ENGL 242 D: Reading Prose Fiction

Meeting Time: 
MW 2:30pm - 4:20pm
Location: 
CDH 125
SLN: 
13897
Instructor:
Photo of Laura Chrisman
Laura Chrisman

Syllabus Description:

Professor Laura Chrisman

B401 Padelford

lhc3@uw.edu

Spring Quarter 2017

Office hours: W 1-2pm or by appointment

 

English 242D: Reading Prose Fiction: Utopias and Dystopias.  

M W 2.30-4.20pm, Condon Hall 125

This course centers on dystopian and utopian fiction: literature concerned with political, socio-economic and cultural transformation. This fiction uses imaginative settings to envision and explore injustice, resistance and revolution. What generates these processes? What alters them? Examining this fiction—written during the late 20th century—allows us to ask about, and gain insights into, our own turbulent political moment.

As this course fulfills the W requirement, students will engage in intensive writing activities. They are expected to keep up with reading and come to class ready to participate in discussion.

Class will involve a range of educational methods that may include small group discussion, large group discussion, student presentation, and instructor lecture.

We focus on these primary literary texts, and proceed in their chronological sequence:

Marge Piercy, Woman on the Edge of Time

Octavia Butler, Parable of the Sower

Nalo Hopkinson, Brown Girl in the Ring

 

Please acquire your own hard copies of these novels from the University Bookstores.  You will be expected to make notes in the book’s margins.

Secondary readings may be provided on the class Canvas website.

NB: All cell phones must be turned off and put away during class.  Laptops, IPADs, tablets are permitted for class purposes.

Course Objectives.

  1. Students are able to critically explore the materials covered in the course.
  2. Students are able to perform competent close readings of literary texts.
  3. Students use writing opportunities as a space to develop sound metacognitive practices and to critically reflect on their reading practices through writing.
  4. Students develop an awareness of literature’s ability to mediate social, political and economic issues.
  5. Students develop an understanding of various approaches to the topic of utopia/dystopia.

 

Course assignments and assessments:

Participation: 30% of final grade

Production of class discussion posts: 20% of final grade

Mid-term paper of 1,500 words: 20% of final grade

Final paper of 2,500-3,000 words: 30% of final grade

These word counts do not include the Works Cited pages

 

In assigning grades,  I adhere to the University grading system: see the end of the syllabus for an outline.

Participation. 

This includes productive speaking and listening: the sharing of ideas, questions, issues arising from the week's reading; constructive engagement with the ideas of others in the class; making connections with topics and ideas arising from previous weeks; showing initiative in non-prescribed secondary research which you share with the class. 

In order to participate effectively you must have thoroughly prepared the class readings. In preparing the readings please note down the page numbers of particular passages, sentences which you then direct the class's attention to: the more specific your references are, the more productive the class discussion can be.

Discussion Posts.

Our course discussion board is an extension of our in-class learning community. It’s a place where you can track your reading process and work through thoughts, reactions, and questions in informal, low-stakes writing. Your posts should be coherent and proofread, but you don’t need to have a fully formed thesis. In fact, you may find that you raise more questions than you answer in your weekly writing. You’ll also find that your classmates’ ideas and interpretations can serve as catalysts for your own analysis later in our formal writing assignments.

In addition to the assigned reading for each class period, you should also keep up with the discussion posts and come to class prepared to incorporate some of the material into our in-class discussions. You do not need to read every single comment, but rather skim most, and read several (3-4) posts that interest you more closely.

Our class will be divided into three different teams. Each post, whether you’re a first reader or respondent, should be 250 words minimum and quote directly from the text. Each week, you need only fulfill one role on the blog:

  1. First Readers: post initial reactions, insights, and discussion questions by the start of class. Quote from the text at least once.
  2. Respondents: build upon, challenge, or clarify first readers’ posts by the start of class. Quote directly from a classmate’s post, and point to at least one specific passage from that day’s reading.
  3. Synthesizers: no writing on the discussion board is required, but you should read several of your classmates’ posts (3-4) that interest you. You are reading closely to make connections and raise new questions. Take notes and be prepared to contribute to class discussion.

All discussion posts are graded on the four-point scale, and will be averaged to equal 20% of your total course grade. Your contributions as “synthesizer” are part of your participation grade.

Formal Writing Assignments: All papers should be in 12 point, double spaced, each page numbered, 1 inch margins all round, Times New Roman, stapled. They should follow MLA style (as in the 7th edition). You are responsible for proof-reading. Here is a link to the MLA guidelines:

http://www.easybib.com/guides/citation-guides/mla-format/

Mid-term paper: I will provide a prompt concerning Woman on the Edge of Time.

Final paper: this will be on Parable of the Sower and Brown Girl in the Ring.  You are responsible for devising your essay’s title and topic. The topic must fall within the concerns of the course. You need for me to approve it before you start writing.  

Both mid-terms and finals should display textual and conceptual engagement, argument, and original insight. The final papers should also display contextual knowledge. Final papers must have a ‘Works Cited’ section that lists the texts discussed, cited, consulted, with full publication details.

There should be at least 4 items in the ‘Works Cited’ including the primary texts. Those items need to be works that your essay shows actual knowledge of; that is, works that you cite and draw upon in the essay.

My criteria for grading papers include:

--The strength of reasoning. I look for a clearly-presented, rigorous and persuasive argument.

--The strength of interpretation of the primary material. I look for insight and careful analysis of the material that emerges from very close, thoughtful reading.

--The structure and organization of the paper.

--The quality of presentation, grammar and syntax.

 

The Purdue Online Writing Lab is a useful resource on the mechanics of writing:

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/1/

See in particular the sections on ‘Mechanics’, ‘Grammar’, ‘Punctuation’.

 

See the end of this syllabus for some writing do’s and don’ts.

 

Missing class: absences will make it hard to succeed in this course and may negatively affect your participation grade.  If you are going to miss a class, please email me to let me know in advance. If you do miss class, it’s a great idea to send out an email to the class list or to ask a fellow student for information on what you missed. NB: Do not ask me—I don’t repeat missed material!  

Late Policy: Students are required to complete and hand in all assignments on designated days. No late assignments will be accepted without prior explanation.

Instructor Communication Rules of Conduct: Please address me by my title and last name: Professor Chrisman. Because I am committed to serving all of my students equally I have to set strict boundaries as to the manner and subject matter of all communications. E-mailed questions will generally be addressed within 72 hours (excluding weekends and holidays). Do not send me canvas messages – I do not check this feature of the site regularly.

Do not e-mail me questions that are answered explicitly in the syllabus or on the Canvas site. I will delete these without replying. Most questions are best answered in person, either during my office hours, before or after class time, and as a last resort: e-mail. 

Office Hours:  This is a time where you and I can meet outside class to discuss assignments, questions about the reading, concerns about expectations, etc.  If my scheduled hours are inaccessible to you, please email me to make appointments for another time. 

Zero Tolerance Policy: Respect for difference of all kinds is vital to creating a safe, supportive and stimulating classroom community. This class takes a zero tolerance policy toward words or actions that insult, demean, or belittle any individual or group of persons based on race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual preference, ability, economic class, national origin, language, or age. Academic freedom, freedom of speech, and freedom of discourse DO NOT protect racism or other acts of harassment and hate. Violations of this Zero Tolerance Policy may result in removal from the classroom and actions governed by the student code of conduct will be taken.

Academic Honesty: It is essential that you properly cite other people’s ideas and language in your writing. In your assignments for this course, I encourage you to cite extensively from the wide array of texts you are in dialogue with; however, you must do so properly. Summarizing someone else’s work and not citing them is considered plagiarism and has significant consequences for your career at the UW.  It may result in the failure of an assignment, the failure of the course, or expulsion from the university.  Don’t plagiarize.

 

University of Washington Resources 

Accommodation: Please let me know if you need accommodation of any sort. The UW Disability Services Office (DSO) can assist you and/or you can come directly to me.  I’m very willing to take suggestions specific to this class to meet your needs.   The DSO can be contacted at dso@u.washington.edu, and Phone (206) 543-6450

Odegaard Writing Center (from group website): This is the place to come and chat with peer tutors and librarians, to grow as a writer in the context of whatever project is foremost in your mind. We can't magically "fix" papers for you (it wouldn't help you long-term if we could), but we can ask all kinds of smart questions and talk with you in order to help you with:

Understanding your assignment — What’s expected of you? What's going on in this writing situation?

Researching — Where can you find appropriate academic resources for your paper? How can you identify useful and credible sources?

         Brainstorming — What directions might your writing take?

         Outlining — How might you shape or organize your ideas?

         Drafting — How can you develop your ideas and connect your thoughts coherently?

Revising — How can you re-see and reconsider your large and small scale writing choices to make the writing more effective?

The Odegaard Writing Center is open to all members of the UW community -- students, staff, and faculty -- and feature exceptional tutors and convenient hours. Sign-up for an appointment today.

For more information or to set up an appointment, visit: http://depts.washington.edu/owrc/

 ELL/MLL English Language Learning Resources (from group website):

English Language Learner students to participate in the Odegaard Writing and Research Center “Targeted Learning Communities” (TLC). The OWRC tutors work with small groups of students who share a reading- or writing- intensive course. Students work together with the tutor to troubleshoot some of the difficulties they encounter as ELL/MLL writers.

You can team up with other English language learners from your class and be partnered with an OWRC tutor, who will meet with your group once a week for an hour at a time you choose together.  The goals of these weekly meetings are to help you take control of your learning, connect with classmates, practice good study habits, and get the most out of your class. We can help you with things like:

*reading difficult course texts

*participating in class discussions and activities

*understanding assignments

*brainstorming and developing ideas that fit each new writing situation

*writing successful rough drafts

*seeking out feedback and revising your papers

*working collaboratively with the teacher and your classmates

*knowing what other resources and support services are available to you

 

Campus Safety (from UW website): Preventing violence is everyone's responsibility. If you're concerned, tell someone. Always call 911 if you or others may be in danger. Call 206-685-SAFE (7233) to report non-urgent threats of violence and for referrals to UW counseling and/or safety resources. TTY or VP callers, please call through your preferred relay service.

    Don't walk alone. Campus safety guards can walk with you on campus after dark. Call Husky NightWalk 206-685-WALK (9255).

    Stay connected in an emergency with UW Alert. Register your mobile number to receive instant notification of campus emergencies via text and voice messaging. Sign up online at www.washington.edu/alert.

For more information visit the SafeCampus website at www.washington.edu/safecampus.

 

 Q Center (from group website): The University of Washington Q Center builds and facilitates queer (gay, lesbian, bisexual, two-spirit, trans, intersex, questioning, same-gender-loving, allies) academic and social community through education, advocacy, and support services to achieve a socially-just campus in which all people are valued. For more information, visit http://depts.washington.edu/qcenter/

FIUTS (from group website): Foundation for International Understanding through Students: FIUTS is an example of a campus organization that can bring together your social and academic learning. "FIUTS is an independent non-profit organization which provides cross-cultural leadership and social programming for UW's international and globally minded domestic students. FIUTS is local connections and global community!" FIUTS also offers a free international lunch on the last Wednesday of every month. Consult FIUTS' web site for a detailed calendar of events and links to many resources http://www.fiuts.washington.edu

 

Provisional Schedule:

3/27

Intro

 

 

3/29

Woman on the Edge of Time: Close reading practice

 

 

Syllabus Review

 

 

Week 2

Hope, Neoliberalism and Woman on the Edge of Time

 

4/3

Rebecca Solnit,  https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/jul/15/rebecca-solnit-hope-in-the-dark-new-essay-embrace-unknown

 

 

George Monbiot, https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/15/neoliberalism-ideology-problem-george-monbiot

 

 

4/5

Woman on the Edge of Time

First Readers (Group 1)

 

pp.1-99 (chapters 1-4)

 

 

 

 

 

Week 3

Woman on the Edge of Time

 

 4/10

Woman on the Edge of Time

 

Responders (Group 2)

 

pp.100-206 (chapter 5-9)

 

 

4/12

Woman on the Edge of Time

 

Synthesizers (Group 3)

 

pp. 207-312 (chapters 10-14)

 

 

 

Midterm paper prompt distributed

 

 

Week 4

Woman on the Edge of Time and Parable of the Sower

 

 

4/17

Woman on the Edge of Time

 

 

pp.313-417 (chapters 15-20)

 

 

4/19

Parable of the Sower

 

 

 

pp.1-85 (chapters 1-7)

 

 

 

 

 

Week 5

Parable of the Sower and Peer Review of Mid Term drafts

 

4/24

Peer Review of mid-term draft papers (8 groups)

 

 

 

 

4/26

Parable of the Sower

 

First Readers (Group 2)

 

pp.86-178 (chapters 8-15)

 

 

 

 

 

Week 6

Parable of the Sower

 

5/1

Parable of the Sower

Responders (Group 3)

 

 

pp. 179-257 (chapters 16-20)

 

5/3

Parable of the Sower

Synthesizers (Group 1)

 

pp. 258-329  (chapters 21-25)

 

 

Midterm paper due in Canvas (11:59pm)

 

 

Week 7

Brown Girl in the Ring

 

5/8

Brown Girl in the Ring

 

 

 

pp.1-59 (chapters 1-3)

 

5/10

Brown Girl in the Ring

 

First Readers (Group 3)

 

pp.60-127 (chapters 4-5)

 

 

 

 

 

Week 8

Brown Girl in the Ring

 

5/15

Brown Girl in the Ring

Responders (Group 1)

 

pp.128-197 (chapters 6-9)

 

5/17

Brown Girl in the Ring

Synthesizers (Group 2)

 

pp.198-247 (chapters 7-14)

 

 

 

 

Week 9

Writing Workshops on Final Paper Proposals

 

5/22

Writing Workshop: Proposal Critique

Group 1 presents proposals

 

 

 

5/24

Writing Workshop: Proposal Critique

Group 2 presents proposals

 

 

 

 

 

 

Week 10

 

 

5/29

No class

 

 

 

 

5/31

Writing Workshop: Proposal Critique

Group 3 presents proposals

6/7

Final paper due, to Canvas, 2pm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Some writing do’s and don’ts.

Structure essays  with a short introduction in which you indicate what is significant about the issue you have chosen to write on (also known as articulating ‘the stakes’). You might also outline the argument that your essay will pursue. Your essay should then move to a substantial discussion that gives the analysis and presents your argument. End with a conclusion that sums up your discussion and draws out its implications for further understanding of the literary text.

Regarding essay style: I like the use of the first person to present your argument. If you are uncomfortable using the first person, however, don’t do it: just be careful to write in a way that foregrounds your own argument and avoids the appearance of descriptiveness or derivativeness.

Regarding essay titles: I like essay titles that set up a concept, or issue, to be explored. I do not like essay titles that set up an imperative such as ‘Discuss the treatment of Englishness in…’ (better would be ‘Englishness in…)  Nor do I like essay titles that present a direct question, such as ‘How pessimistic is Armah’s writing?’ (better would be ‘Pessimism and Armah’)

Here are some 'do nots'. Doing these will lower your grade; these are pet peeves .

Do not describe the literary text. [Instead, analyse it.]

Do not write in the mode of literary appreciation. [Instead, write in an academic mode.]

Do not make sweeping generalisations (eg, about the history of the world, the nature of human psychology, such as 'it is widely known that Western culture is essentially dominatory').[Instead, keep your comments precise, specific, and supported by scholarship and observation.]

Do not give empirical information (eg, information about a historical period) without giving a source for your information in the footnotes.

Do not misuse the apostrophe (this includes using ‘it’s’ instead of ‘its’; using apostrophes before an ‘s’ to indicate a plural noun, omitting to use them to mark possession).

Do not misuse commas by inserting them incorrectly or by omitting to use them.

Do not write paragraphs that are one double-spaced page or longer.

Do not use the past tense when analyzing a text. Use the present tense. That is, instead of ‘This author wrote/this character said’ write ‘This author writes/this character says’.

Do not use dangling modifiers, such as  ‘Having finished her assignment, the television was turned on’.

Do not write sentences that aren’t sentences because they lack a verb.

Make sure that the sentence subject and verb agree.

Remember when writing essays on fiction to avoid writing about characters as if they are real. Instead, if you want to explore characterisation, you need to analyse the way that the writer constructs characters, and what the significance of this literary construction might be.

Avoid writing about characters, or a single character, as if they constitute the whole of the literary text. Remember that a fictional text consists of much more than its characters. Other elements of a text include: narrative structure; imagery; language; ideology; intertextual relationship to other texts.

Avoid the trap of writing about the text as if it is simply an emanation of the author’s psyche or their personal experience. The object of analysis is the text, not the author’s personality. If you are invoking biographical information you might consider the differences between the author’s ‘real life’ experience and its representation in the literary text.

In short: keep your emphasis on analyzing the text—its ideas, its structure, and its style.

Standard Grading System

Numerical grades may be considered equivalent to letter grades as follows:

Letter

Number

Note

A

4.0-3.9

A-

3.8-3.5

B+

3.4-3.2

B

3.1-2.9

B-

2.8-2.5

C+

2.4-2.2

C

2.1-1.9

C-

1.8-1.5

D+

1.4-1.2

D

1.1-0.9

D-

0.8-0.7

Lowest passing grade.

E

0.0

Academic failure.
No credit earned.

 

 

 

Catalog Description: 
Critical interpretation and meaning in works of prose fiction, representing a variety of types and periods.
GE Requirements: 
Visual, Literary, and Performing Arts (VLPA)
Writing (W)
Credits: 
5.0
Status: 
Active
Last updated: 
January 10, 2018 - 10:01pm